The National Trust's War on Literacy: How Pointing Out "Toliets" Became a Sackable Offence.
A heritage charity that can't spell "heritage" just banned a cancer patient for noticing. Welcome to Britain 2026, where accuracy is violence and incompetence is a protected characteristic.
Right, so let me see if I’ve got this straight.
The National Trust — that venerable institution founded in 1895 to preserve Britain’s cultural heritage — has just permanently banned a 71-year-old volunteer with stage-2 prostate cancer.
His crime? He spent 400 hours documenting thousands of spelling and factual errors on their website. After being ignored twice by the Director-General who’d just received a CBE for “services to heritage,” he had the audacity to complain.
When a heritage charity can’t maintain basic accuracy and someone notices, they don’t fix it. They ban the person who noticed.
The 400-Hour Gift
Andy Jones volunteered for the National Trust for 14 years — gardening, guiding visitors through Surrey’s Devil’s Punch Bowl, answering queries. Standard volunteer stuff. Unpaid.
Then in 2024, he assumed an organisation dedicated to preserving heritage might care about getting details right.
He compiled a dossier. Four hundred hours cataloguing thousands of errors: “toliets” instead of “toilets,” “permanant” instead of “permanent,” “take a peak” for “peek,” Pre-Raphaelite artist Lucy Madox Brown misspelled as “Maddox Brown.”
On a heritage website. Where accuracy is literally the entire point.
November 2024: Jones sent this to Hilary McGrady, the Director-General, politely asking if she’d forward it “to whomsoever has the authority and resources to address these errors.”
Silence.
January 2025: He followed up. “I sincerely hope my work is helpful to the National Trust.”
More silence.
McGrady had just been awarded a CBE for “services to heritage.” But 400 hours of unpaid analysis from a 14-year veteran? Couldn’t find time to reply. Not even to acknowledge receipt.
Organisational Values.
Jones, frustrated and dealing with cancer, finally snaps. He quits, sends one final email containing “the Oirish Dame” and describing her website as “crappy not fit for purpose.”
Inappropriate? Sure. The kind of thing you say when sick and watching 400 hours vanish into indifference? Yes.
This time they responded.
Not to fix errors. To ban him. Permanently. From every National Trust property in Britain.
“I was really disappointed by the language contained within your email. These comments are not in line with our organisational values.”
Organisational values. According to demonstrated behaviour: misspelling “toilets,” getting Pre-Raphaelite names wrong, ignoring 400 hours of quality control from a cancer patient, permanently banning volunteers for pointing out errors.
But noticing they can’t spell? That crosses a line.
“Irreversibly broken down” — “we will no longer consider you for any future volunteer positions at any of our places.”
Any of our places. Lifetime ban. Every property. For 400 hours of trying to help.
The Pattern.
Now, here’s where this stops being a quirky story about a pedantic pensioner and starts being a case study in institutional dysfunction.
Because Andy Jones isn’t an isolated incident.
In June 2024, the National Trust suspended 13 volunteer gardeners at Mottistone Manor on the Isle of Wight who’d collectively contributed over 100 years of expertise. Why? “Instances of behaviour, language, or attitude that do not reflect the respectful and inclusive culture we strive for.”
What were these instances? The Trust wouldn’t say. Just vague accusations and 13 people shown the door.
Graham Field, 76, said: “With a cold and dismissive click of a send button, over 100 years of gardening skill, site-specific knowledge and hard work were lost to the Trust.”
See the pattern? Long-serving volunteers. Vague accusations about values. No specific examples. Permanent exclusion.
Then there’s Dunham Massey, where around 70 volunteers had their roles “paused” during a “structural review.” Same template.
This isn’t about spelling mistakes. This is about an organisation that’s undergone ideological capture and is systematically purging anyone who doesn’t conform.
The Inversion.
Here’s the mathematical contradiction at the heart of this lunacy:
The National Trust’s stated mission: Preserve Britain’s heritage, history, and cultural accuracy for future generations.
The National Trust’s demonstrated priority: Protect staff feelings from volunteers who notice factual errors.
When they come into direct conflict, the National Trust has shown you exactly what takes precedence. Feelings win. Accuracy loses. Every single time.
This is the inversion. Where a heritage charity treats heritage as less important than managing internal emotions. Where “inclusive culture” means excluding people who take the actual work seriously.
The maths is simple. Four hundred hours of unpaid quality control from a 14-year volunteer: worth nothing. One mildly rude email from a cancer patient who was ignored twice: worth a lifetime ban from every property in Britain.
And here’s the kicker: Hilary McGrady, who couldn’t find time to acknowledge 400 hours of unpaid work, just received a CBE. For services to heritage. Which heritage, exactly? The misspelled one?
The Broader Disease.
This isn’t just about one charity. This is Britain in 2026.
Every major British institution follows the same pattern: founded with clear mission, mission attracts ideologically motivated administrators, administrators redefine mission around ideology, anyone pointing out contradictions gets excluded, organisation continues using original credibility while serving opposite purpose.
The National Trust is just further along the curve.
It’s the same mechanism Bristol City Council uses promising 1,000 new affordable homes while selling 1,222 existing ones. The same mechanism where transparency becomes “vexatious” and accountability becomes “harassment.”
The system inverts. The mission becomes the opposite. The language stays the same but the meaning reverses.
Where This Goes.
The National Trust can’t survive the slow realisation among volunteers that competence is punished and compliance rewarded.
Volunteers believe in the mission. When they watch a 14-year veteran banned for taking it seriously, they learn the mission is cosmetic. That 400 hours matters less than one rude email. That accuracy matters less than anxiety management.
The good ones — those who care about getting it right — leave, stop caring, or learn to shut up and let the errors accumulate.
That’s how institutions die. Not in a bang, but in slow accumulation of uncorrected errors maintained by people who’ve learned noticing problems is more dangerous than ignoring them.
The Epilogue: Spelling Mistakes as Symptom.
Here’s the thing about “toliets” — it’s not actually about spelling.
It’s about an organisation so insulated from accountability that they can’t maintain basic quality control. It’s about management so disconnected that 400 hours of documented errors doesn’t warrant a response. It’s about a culture where pointing out problems is treated as creating problems.
The spelling mistakes are just the visible symptom. The actual disease is institutional sclerosis.
And when Andy Jones sent that dossier, he wasn’t complaining about typos. He was holding up a mirror. He was saying: “Look at what you’ve become. Look at the gap between what you say you do and what you actually do.”
The National Trust looked in that mirror and didn’t like what it saw.
So they banned the mirror.
That’s not organisational values. That’s organisational cowardice.
Welcome to British institutions in 2026. Where accuracy is violence, incompetence is protected, and the only real crime is noticing.
The National Trust has made their values perfectly clear.
They’re just not the values they think they’re demonstrating.
Sources.
Primary Reporting:
“National Trust blacklists volunteer who pointed out spelling mistakes,” The Telegraph, via The Daily Sceptic, January 1, 2026
“National Trust volunteer ‘blacklisted’ after flagging spelling mistakes on charity’s website,” LBC, January 2, 2026
“National Trust BANS volunteer in 70s from every property for pointing out spelling mistakes on website,” GB News, January 2, 2026
Official Documentation: 4. National Trust Annual Report 2024–25, National Trust, 2025 (membership and financial figures) 5. National Trust spokesperson statement to The Telegraph, January 2026
Pattern Documentation: 6. “National Trust blacklists volunteer who pointed out spelling mistakes,” Restore Trust, January 1, 2026 (Mottistone Manor incident details) 7. Graham Field statement regarding Mottistone Manor gardeners, June 2024
All quotes from Andy Jones, National Trust managers, and National Trust spokespeople are sourced from these publications’ reporting of direct correspondence and interviews.
The Almighty Gob.
Bristol’s least favourite investigative blogger. Except, I don’t believe one word of it!
The above quote, courtesy of www.bristoluncovered.uk-bristol-in-numbers-2025-review. Check Chris out, he’s quite brilliant with numbers and stats for Bristol.
If you enjoyed this descent into institutional madness, subscribe to get more documented dysfunction delivered direct to your inbox. If you hated it, well, that’s not in line with my organisational values, so you’re banned from reading.
Share this if you think heritage charities should know how to spell. Or don’t. The National Trust has demonstrated they don’t actually care either way.